The first essay I wrote at university was returned to me with the phrase ‘awkward prose, needs work,‘ scrawled on the back with a thick pencil. I was mortified, thinking at the time that I was hot stuff and would carry all before me with the power of my pen. Even now, the subject of that one essay is still fresh in my mind, while the years that followed are no more than a hazy memory.
Embarrassing as it was, this episode was my introduction to the painful process of editing, and I’m thankful it happened at a young age. The essays that came after were hacked half to death, reading more like crisp technical manuals than lively historical arguments, but things settled down after a year or so, and the prose became more readable.
We all need to be told our writing is clumsy and awkward at some point, otherwise we carry on in blissful ignorance, inflicting our barely coherent ramblings on the world. When I began work on PageFour, there was no intention of addressing the editing process, my thinking was that this was something every writer must tackle themselves. Instead, the primary focus has always been to improve the writing environment, and remove whatever distractions might exist to interrupt the writer in full flow.
But now I face a dilemma. For the past few weeks, I’ve been thinking of introducing a feature into PageFour that would step over this line.
From my own experience, one of the more common problems tackled when editing, is repeated words and phrases, where the same two or three words appear many times across paragraphs, pages and chapters. When this is not intentional, it can be incredibly difficult to catch, often slipping through many editing iterations.
Computers however, have no interest in how smooth your prose reads, and would flag these potential problems in a heartbeat. So the question is, should I implement this feature?
I’ve already designed the user interface in my mind, and it looks good - tucked away out of sight until it might be needed. The way I see the feature working, a single page or a number of pages would be read, and a list of two, three, or four word phrases that appear more than a certain number of times would be displayed. It would then be up to the writer to decide if these needed to be looked at in any detail. An additional linked feature might be a similar list of words or phrases used at the beginning of sentences.
Up to now, I’ve based the design of PageFour on what works for me, but I fully realise that implementing a feature that plays a part in the editing process may prove a serious turn off for many people.
Is crossing the line into editing a step too far?

March 28th, 2006 at 9:00 pm
You know, I don’t think editing functions are crossing the line at all. PageFour is marketed toward writers, and editing features are important for writers. I would make sure, though, that whatever editing functions you do include are as stable as the rest of the program. They should also be inconspicuous and not too cluttering on the toolbar–maybe have one button that opens all the editing functions. If you decide to take it a few steps further, you might want to take a look at TexNotes Pro over at www.gemx.com. Texnotes tries to do what PageFour does, but it is geared toward business and art users as well, so it is a massive and complicated program that gets very busy. It also stores the data as a single file, which spells corruption trouble to me. But one thing I do like about it is the statistical analysis it will do for you. It will analyze a passage and tell you how many instances there are of each word. It counts unique words and counts passive verbs. It also assigns a readability index(Gunning-Fog)and Flesch-Kincaid grade level score. The crazy thing is that they don’t even advertise these features, you discover them when you fool around with the program. And the software is less expensive than grammar checking programs that are out there.
hmmm… now that I think about it, maybe they don’t advertise these features because they are some how proprietary to another company… better check that out first I guess
If you do step across the editing threshold, I wouldn’t worry about turning people off. If some writers don’t like those features, they won’t use them. I just wouldn’t make a BIG point about them and I wouldn’t increase the price too much because of them. But I would mention the new features. For many, I bet it would be a selling point.
Hope that helps…
By the way I made a link to PageFour on my new blog. I like it that much. You can check it out at www.pediascribe.com.
Take care
Mike
March 29th, 2006 at 6:02 am
Thanks Mike. One thing that’s always turned me off about software targeting writers is the very suspect claims many of them make to ‘improve’ your writing, which is the main reason I’ve avoided any hint of editing capabilities up to now. But like you say, as longs as it doesn’t detract from the simplicity of the rest of the application, and is hidden from sight until required, it shouldn’t offend too many people.
The features you mention in TextNotes sound very similar, so I’ll need to be careful to avoid even looking at it until my own work is complete. I’ve found it’s always best to work form a clean sheet, without outside influences, otherwise you can easily end up copying someone else - weak points and all.
Good luck with the blog, and thanks for the link. Every little helps.
March 30th, 2006 at 11:12 pm
I would love to see some editing functions. I’m not sure how or what you would/could implement them, but that would really help.
March 31st, 2006 at 10:11 am
It’s definitely doable Melly, the key would be to ensure that the software never made any decisions - that it pointed out areas to look at and left the real work to the writer.
There’s nothing worse than a grammar checker making you question your most creative sentences by placing a squiggly green line underneath.
Anyway, I’ll have a much better idea in a couple of weeks.