Is your novel a ‘tour de force’?
How many times have you come across a book described as a ‘tour de force‘? Did the description impress you so much you reached for your wallet then and there, determined that nothing would stand in your way and you would have the book or die trying?
I’m guessing not.
When I was a teenager I read a lot of science fiction, and every second novel had these three words plastered in gold print on the cover, or tucked away somewhere in the blurb on the back. The words were often in quotes and attributed to no one - free flowing as if from the mouth of God herself.
My favourite online dictionary describes a ‘tour de force‘ as: ‘A feat requiring great virtuosity or strength, often deliberately undertaken for its difficulty.’ No doubt books not described in this way were written casually, merely tossed out quickly one Sunday afternoon without any great effort on the part of the writer. Applying the literal meaning of the phrase would surely suggest that intricate works of physics or mathematics, and even boring volumes on the complexities of the Inland Revenue, are far more deserving of the title than short novels such as Heart of Darkness.
There seems to be a system in the use of this phrase by publishers of fiction. The novel should be not less than five hundred pages in length, otherwise it cannot truly have required any great strength or endurance to produce. Where possible, it should have a picture of a spaceship on the cover or if not a spaceship, at least some sort of futuristic scene that suggests an impressive imagination on the part of the writer.
I encountered one exception to this rule a few months ago in the form of The Quincunx, a novel set in nineteenth century England without a spaceship in sight. No doubt its extraordinary length of twelve hundred and forty eight pages made up for the lack of any form of space age setting. By the same token it can be deduced that The Count of Monte Cristo, at over eleven hundred pages, has earned the title ‘tour de force,’ while the more modestly sized The Black Tulip was merely a good read.
The lesson to be learned from all this is that if you want your new novel to be awarded this covetous title, it should be of great length and set somewhere in the distant future. If your work takes place in current times, or god forbid at some point in the recent past, it must have a truly exceptional word count, somewhere along the lines of Clarissa, before laying any sort of claim to the title. The advantage of producing a novel of such staggering size is that no one will ever read it to the end, and anyone who makes the attempt will be convinced long before they quit of your ‘great virtuosity and strength,’ making the book without doubt a ‘tour de force.’

April 6th, 2006 at 8:09 pm
What I get from this is that you mean ‘tour de force‘ describes the effort that goes into the writing of the book. What about a plotlint that involves ‘A feat requiring great virtuosity or strength, often deliberately undertaken for its difficulty.’?
April 6th, 2006 at 8:09 pm
plotlint = plotline
April 6th, 2006 at 8:11 pm
I guess that’s your whole point. *sighs*
April 6th, 2006 at 8:47 pm
The point I was making was that the phrase is so over used by publishers, on books that have little to recommend them beyond their length that its true meaning is lost.
If a book earned the description through tackling a difficult plot like you say, being awarded the title would probably have a negative effect.
It’s like the boy who cried wolf - when the real wolf arrived everyone ignored him and carried on with their business.
April 7th, 2006 at 12:09 am
I agree with you. But don’t all books have blurbs and phrases to make them sound good - often better than they are? I’m sure many of the ‘quotes’ are out of context.
Personally, I look at a lot more than the length of a book or the blurbs to decide if it’s something to add to my TBR file.
April 7th, 2006 at 6:33 am
Too true.
The beauty of buying books online is that ignoring the publisher’s promotional efforts has become so much easier. The flashy book covers and selected extracts from one or two critics get replaced by recommendations from real people without a sales agenda.
April 9th, 2006 at 7:12 pm
I guess it’s like all the paperbacks you see that say “Now a major motion picture!” Has there ever been a minor motion picture?
April 9th, 2006 at 7:50 pm
Now there’s a thought. If the cover actually said “May at some point become a minor motion picture, or at least a B movie of suspect quality,” or “Not exactly a tour de force, but the author was really tired after finishing it,” I might be intrigued enough to buy it.
Originality is in such short supply when it comes to established mainstream businesses, that when found it’s almost always noteworthy.